Due to current events, the International Politics department regularly uses additional manual and technical procedures to effectively combat plagiarism and to ensure fair assessments. We take legal action against persons who intentionally attempt to deceive.
At least since 2016, Brexit has been one of the dominating issues in European politics. Most recently, the passage of the “Internal Market Act” has intensified the uncertainties surrounding the UK's exit from the EU. A “hard Brexit” without a trade agreement at the end of the year seems increasingly likely.
The lively public and academic debate surrounding Brexit has so far focused primarily on the reasons and consequences of Brexit for Great Britain, the EU or individual member states. But the myriad uncertainties that have unfolded since the announcement of the British in/out-referendum have also left deep marks worldwide. As a result, external partners of the EU are not only changing their perception of the EU and Great Britain but are already adapting their foreign policy in light of these developments and uncertainties.
The newly published edited volume “Changing Perceptions of the EU at Times of Brexit Global Perspectives”, edited by Prof. Natalia Chaban, Prof. Arne Niemann and Johanna Speyer, is dedicated to these international implications of Brexit, which can already be observed today. In 15 country studies, internationally recognized experts trace the developments in various strategic partner countries around the globe. In their conclusion, the three editors interrogate these country specific findings for regional similarities and develop policy recommendations for European external action.
The research project which lead to this volume was funded, inter alia, by the European Commission as part of the Jean Monnet chair (Erasmus +), the Fritz Thyssen Foundation and the JGU Mainz.
The edited volume "Changing Perceptions of the EU at Times of Brexit. Global Perspectives ” has been published by Routledge. The following code guarantees a 20% discount on the purchase price: SOC20 (please enter the code at checkout).
Natalia Chaban, Arne Niemann und Johanna Speyer (eds)
Changing Perceptions of the EU at Times of Brexit. Global Perspectives
Routledge, July 2020: 306 pp.
ISBN (Hb): 978-0-367-27666-9 | £120.00
ISBN (eBook): 978-0-429-31706-4
Within the Jean Monnet Chair sponsored series “Careers with European Studies and International Relations” Johannes Rabenschlag will give a talk that is entitled:
Consulting by day - research by night: Career in the private sector while doing a PhD at the University
Tuesday, 2 June, 12:15 – 13:45 via Skype for Business
If you want to take part, please write an Email by 1 June, 23:59 to Laura Hähn who can provide you with the link for the Skype for Business session. There will be time for your questions.
Professor of International PoliticsJean Monnet Chair of European Integration Studies
the electronic exam for the lecture “The Politics of European Integration” will take place on Thursday, 20 February 2020 from 8:45-12:00 in Rooms N33, KR1 and KR2 in the Faculty of Natural Science and Data Centre (Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 21).
The exam will be written in two groups:
Group 1: MIEPP and Erasmus/exchange students: 8h45-10h, Room N33
Group 2: all BA/B.Ed students: 10h00-12h00, Rooms N33, KR1 und KR2
For identification purposes, you must bring your ID card/ Passport and your student identity card (Note that a driver’s licence or the like is not sufficient!).
your International Politics Unit
The results of the module examination in the field of International Relations in the are now available and will be published promptly by the examination office in JOGU-STINe.
You can review your exam at the following date by appointment:
17 April 2019, 10:00 to 12.00 and 14:00 to 17:00
To register, please send an e-mail to Mrs. Johanna Speyer (email@example.com) by 2 April 2019 at the latest. Mrs. Speyer will arrange with you the exact time of your appointment.
External Perceptions of the EU after Brexit
Workshop hosted by the Jean Monnet Chair at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 28-29 June 2018
On June 23rd, 2016, 52% of the British voted in a referendum to leave the European Union (EU). Since then, the upcoming withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the EU has been heavily discussed in Europe and around the globe. Whereas this debate revolves mainly around the future of the UK and UK-EU relations, little attention has been paid to the reactions of third countries and its effect on the EU's role in the world.
However, Brexit is very likely to have a substantial effect on EU external policy. Not merely because of the loss of a major Member State who is a permanent member of the UN Security Council and maintains a special relationship to the US and the Commonwealth, but also because it tarnishes the integrational success story the EU strives to embody. The UK's planned divorce and specifically the current "period of uncertainty" which ensued after the referendum are thus likely to impact considerably on third countries' perceptions of the EU and influence expectations and policy options worldwide. These images, in turn, condition the effectiveness of EU foreign policy: Only if the EU is seen as attractive, its actions as legitimate, valuable, credible and coherent, European (public) diplomacy and external action will be effective.
The workshop External Perceptions of the EU after Brexit takes up this theoretical angle and discusses the effect of Brexit on external perceptions of the EU and European foreign policy with academic experts from around the globe as well as with policy-makers from Brussels. The event will be lead jointly by Prof. Dr. Natalia Chaban (National Centre for Research on Europe [NCRE], University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Prof. Dr. Arne Niemann and Johanna Speyer (both University of Mainz). Thereby, it draws on the NCRE’s leading expertise in EU external perceptions. Research to make an academically and socially relevant contribution to a topical and highly relevant process.
For further information on the event, please contact Johanna Speyer (firstname.lastname@example.org)
The Kosovo question in Kaub
EU role-playing Students of the Elisabeth-Langgässer-Gymnasium deal with the accession negotiations of Serbia.
Click here for the report
This book explores regionalism in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and highlights the influence of the European Union (EU) as an extra-regional actor on the organization and integration process. The analysis is guided by theory and explains the emergence, institutional design and performance of SADC’s major integration projects in the issue areas of the economy, security and infrastructure. It provides in this way a profound assessment of the organization as a whole.
by Johannes Muntschick
Since the beginning of the 2000s, we have witnessed the European Union (EU) becoming increasingly involved in directly supporting peace negotiations in a variety of inter- and intra-state conflicts by taking on the role of a third-party mediator. By introducing the 2009 Concept on Strengthening EU Mediation and Dialogue Capacities, the EU has further institutionalised mediation as an incremental component of its Common Foreign and Security Policy’s (CFSP) toolkit. However, the EU’s role as an actor in international mediation, and in particular its effectiveness, are considerably under-researched.
Thanks to the generous funding by the German Foundation for Peace Research (Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung, DSF), Prof. Dr. Arne Niemann and Julian Bergmann will conduct a two-year research project on “A Peacemaker in the Making? The European Union as an Actor in International Mediation” to investigate the EU’s role as mediator in peace negotiations. The research project, which builds upon a previously conducted pilot study, pursues three main objectives. First, we aim to better understand how and in what ways the EU has been involved in international mediation activities. Second, we assess the extent to which the EU constitutes an effective mediator in peace negotiations. Third, we seek to explain different degrees of EU mediator effectiveness.
In addition, an important objective of this project is to use the insights gained from the analytical and explanatory components of the project as a basis for knowledge transfer from science to practice, and to establish a policy dialogue with relevant actors. The insights of our project will be used to identify ‘lessons learnt’ from EU mediation efforts, and to give clear-cut recommendations for the further development of a more systematic approach to mediation with regard to capacity-building and accumulation of expertise. The project runs from February 2015 to January 2017 and is funded through a 100.000€ grant by the German Foundation for Peace Research (Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung, DSF).